search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Reference Implementation


Laboratory


(JRIL) test team in support of JTNC’s project manager for joint tactical net- works (PM JTN).


ENABLING COMPETITION Participation in the WIQ 3 provided several benefits for software-defined radio vendors. Tey had the opportu- nity to baseline the WNW hosted on their platforms and to provide a cost- effective risk reduction exercise linked to subsequent field events. Te WIQ 3 also provided them with the chance to evalu- ate waveform application compliance and performance hosted on a radio platform in accordance with the WNW configura- tion package defined by the JRIL.


WIQ 3 also provided NDI industry vendors an opportunity in a field envi- ronment to participate in a simulated, battalion-size network architecture, dem- onstrating to DOD leadership and service acquisition planners


the advantages


WNW offers as a mid-tier network- ing waveform application in a stressed environment. Te simulated network architecture was


representative of the


Army’s objective network architecture, while units at NIE 13.1 focused on the currently fielded bridge network archi- tecture known as Capability Set 13/14.


WIQ 3 successfully demonstrated that WNW is capable of transmitting, distrib- uting and receiving live video, data and voice over Internet Protocol packets from a tactical application while providing network “healing” (autonomous re- forming) relief from a fragmented Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW) company sub- network. WNW further demonstrated rerouting capabilities when an upper-tier access point was removed, forcing infor- mation from the battalion and company networks to direct to another upper-tier access point through the WNW network.


Te use of multiple platforms in a single WNW network further demonstrates the JTNC business model.


REDUCING NONPRODUCTIVE PROCESSES WIQ 3 also provided an excellent oppor- tunity to demonstrate the mid-tier networking capabilities of WNW in a realistic environment, using architectures that meet current and future operational needs of Joint forces. During the WNW demonstration, distinguished visitors at a simulated battalion tactical operations center at White Sands were able to talk to and see nodes moving around the “bat- tlespace” at EPG. In one scenario, the visitors viewed a live video feed from


the fictional


“Alpha Company” com-


mander’s vehicle while simultaneously receiving real-time situation reports from an engagement with suspected insurgents. Future test events will con- tinue to serve as a forum to demonstrate new capabilities and assess the viability of WNW to meet the emerging needs of the warfighter.


“Te continued use of the SRW and WNW Performance and Interoperability Quick-Look events based on the JTNC business model generates waveform soft- ware reuse to increase competition and interoperability while reducing total cost of ownership for defense communica- tion networks,” said Brett Bendt, WNW RIL’s principal test engineer for WIQ 3.


COMMUNITY OF EFFORT Dr. Richard North, JRIL director, describes how to achieve the battalion objective architecture, using a battalion WNW backbone, to a stakeholder during NIE 13.1 at White Sands Missile Range. (Photo courtesy of JTNC)


ASC.ARMY.MIL


33


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168