search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
AVOIDING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK


in 2010, allowing the first use of these devices in training in more than 10 years. Perchlorate-free M115/M116 simulators are now in production and available to Soldiers nationwide. Replacements for other handheld simulators are pending qualification and approval by state officials before fielding. Te M115-M116 Simulator Perchlorate Replacement project team received the 2007 Secretary of the Army Environmental Award for Excellence in Weapons System Acquisition as a result of this development effort.


CONCLUSION Te new assessment tools that are part of the phased approach are


cost-effective in helping


For more information, contact the Toxicology Portfolio at AIPH, at DSN 584-3980, 410-436-3980 or usaphctoxinfo@amedd.army. mil. For more information on NEPA, go to http://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/index.html.


DR. WILLIAM S. ECK is a biologist at AIPH. He holds a B.S. in chemistry from the College of William and Mary, and a Ph.D. in biological chemistry from the University of Maryland at College Park.


to make ESOH-


related development decisions for new formulations. Tey are applicable throughout the RDT&E process. Teir use will not eliminate ESOH risks in weapon systems, but will provide enough data so that decision-makers can understand and mitigate any risks. Additionally, information gained regarding environmental fate—what happens to the compound in the environment—as well as transport and health effects can help transition promising new research by giving acquisition program managers the ESOH data they need. Focused testing or engineering can reduce uncertainty relating to the toxicity of new military-specific substances that could be environmental or occupational health threats, resulting in sustainable use by our forces in an increasingly regulated environment.


MS. KIMBERLY WATTS is deputy director of RDECOM’s Environmental Acquisition and Logistics Sustainment Program. She holds a B.S. in chemistry from Towson University and a B.S. in accounting from the University of Baltimore.


MR. NOAH J. LIEB, P.E., is a chemical engineer with Hughes Associates Inc. He holds a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Maryland at College Park.


DR. MARK S. JOHNSON is director of the Toxicology Portfolio at AIPH. A diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology, he holds a B.S. in zoology from Towson University, an M.S. in applied ecology from the University of Delaware and a Ph.D. in environmental toxicology from the Virginia Polytechnic and State University.


THE PHASED APPROACH TO TOXICITY ASSESSMENT HAS ENABLED RESEARCHERS TO SELECT MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE ENERGETIC MATERIALS FOR THE 2.75-INCH HYDRA ROCKET, ONE OF THE MOST EXTENSIVELY USED MUNITIONS IN THE ARMY, A SIGNIFICANT SOURCE OF TOXIC CONSTITUENTS RELEASED ON TRAINING RANGES AND ONE OF THE MOST ENVIRONMENTALLY PROBLEMATIC MUNITIONS IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION.


56


Army AL&T Magazine


April–June 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168