AVOIDING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK
Implementation of this phased approach is an improvement over the current ESOH risk process; however, it is just a start. T e need for ASTM Standard E2552, and its applicability, extend well beyond the development of energetic materials. T is ESOH evaluation approach provides guid- ance on data needs and evaluation, but it is not a requirement for all programs and is still limited by funding and interest.
T e ideal process would integrate these ESOH data points
as a for advancing to the next
requirement stage of
development. In this case, materials could transition to the next budget activity level or technology readiness level, with a defi nitive list of
required
ESOH data points but without a full evaluation. All materials that transition to the acquisition community thus would be fully characterized, with their risks
well-defi ned, ultimately mitigated.
T at is the ideal. A more reasonable and attainable goal would be to integrate a less restrictive form of this process into an improved RDT&E process, the purpose of which would not be to eliminate risk to the user community, but to provide enough data to the decision-maker to understand possible risks and account for them in moving forward. T e Army will continue to rely on materials that have inherent ESOH risks in order to meet very strict, unique performance requirements; more complete ESOH data will enable the Army to mitigate dramatically any risks to Soldiers, workers and the surrounding community.
SUCCESS STORIES Early eff orts
in applying this process
have been highly successful, with prom- ising new energetic materials evaluated through the RDECOM EALSP Ord- nance Environmental Program (OEP)
54 Army AL&T Magazine April–June 2013
BA1: Basic Research (TRL 1)
IDEAL PROCESS
Note: This figure is conceptually based on the integrated Defense Acquisition and Logistics Life Cycle Management System Chart, but is not an exact representation of the acquisition and RDT&E cycles.
A Materiel Solution Analysis MDD BA – Budget activity MDD – Materiel development decision TRL – Technology readiness level
The proposed improved process incorporates ESOH evaluations earlier in the RDT&E process by requiring fi rst the RDT&E manager (at BA 1–3) and then the PEO or PM (at BA 4-5) to evaluate both the amount of ESOH data collected and the risks identifi ed in the process. In this case, unac- ceptable ESOH risks can require additional research at any point in the RDT&E cycle, forcing the acquisition back through the cycle. In the ideal process, complete ESOH data is still not a require- ment but is an improvement on the current process, providing more complete information to the decision-maker. (SOURCE: AIPH)
B C Technology Development Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support understood and No Yes
BA2: Applied Research (TRL 2,3)
No BA3: Yes Advanced
Technology Development (TRL 4, 5, 6)
Key
Are there adequate ESOH data, and are the ESOH risks acceptable?
No: ESOH risk unacceptable; additional RDT&E or ESOH data required.
Yes: RDT&E manager or PM/PEO accepts risk.
FIGURE 2
No No Yes
BA5: System Development & Demonstration (TRL 8)
No BA4: Yes
Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (TRL 6, 7)
All ESOH risks known and accepted by PM/PEO
Yes
and DOD’s Strategic Environmental Research
and Development Program
for energetic materials. T is approach is gaining acceptance in other development eff orts as well, such as the substitution of environmentally acceptable solvents and surface coatings.
As Figure 3 illustrates, the development of a new energetic material begins at the conception phase with the research chemists’
proposed structure. T is
structure may not even have been synthesized, but its properties and performance characteristics can be evaluated using sophisticated computer
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168