search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DOING MORE WITH LESS As the Army increases C4ISR capability, it runs out of space on its vehicles and Soldiers. CERDEC aims to drastically reduce the size, weight, power and cost burden by advancing projects that enable sharing of C4ISR hardware and software components. (U.S. Army photo by SGT Christopher Bigelow)


exploit the electromagnetic spectrum and have similar architectures, which may include transmitters, receivers, processing units and user interfaces.


In many cases, C4ISR/EW systems


overlap in their use of the electromagnetic spectrum and have similar processing requirements. Tese


similarities suggest


the potential for sharing components among C4ISR/EW systems on a military platform, which could reduce total life- cycle costs for all such systems. In addition, sharing components among C4ISR/EW systems on a single platform, such as a ground or air vehicle or the Soldier, could greatly improve interoperability and compatibility of the individual systems.


Leveraging common components deliver capabilities to is critical to realize


all of the benefits of open hardware and software architectures for implementing C4ISR and EW capabilities. However, reducing the amount of hardware on the platform to realize significant reductions in SWAP-C requires sharing components among C4ISR/EW capa- bilities


as much as possible, which


introduces new challenges. Tis extreme challenge exists because the developer controls all processing requirements. For example, EW capabilities must be more responsive to ever-changing threats. In order to rapidly upgrade for new threats,


this proposed architecture


requires that resource management tools and frameworks be developed to aid in creating


new C4ISR/EW capabilities,


while still meeting the stringent timing requirements of EW capabilities.


One can choose from numerous available standards for open hardware, but the real challenges exist in selecting a standard that can evolve with growing demands, and selecting from the many options to ensure that multiple vendors can build to the standard. For example, the pro- cessing demands and data flows required for many C4ISR/EW systems call for an appropriate data bus that supports data transfer among processing modules.


the


Most of these backplanes do not address RF signals,


dards would have to include RF interface standards. Currently, all of


so digital backplane stan- these stan-


dards leave too much flexibility in the way modules use the data bus provided on the backplane, yet there cannot be optimal interoperability without clearly defining


this mechanism. Additional ASC.ARMY.MIL 73


SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168