search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ENGINEERING OVERSIGHT


The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) oversees about 260 construction, operations and maintenance, and service contracts in the south and west of Afghanistan. Architect and engineering services comprise part of the knowledge-based services portfolio, the single largest in the Army’s services contracting taxonomy. (Photo by Karla Marshall, USACE)


appropriate acquisition management best practices in our services acquisition processes—similar to but not exactly the same as those we use to acquire weapon systems—while still being efficient and responsive. Doing this requires education, training and a transformation in culture by the commands that require services.


Te predominance of requirements for services are developed and approved by commands and their staffs outside of DOD’s and the Army’s Acquisition Corps. Leading the services improvement efforts at OSD [the Office of the Secre- tary of Defense] director of


is Mr. Dick Ginman, defense procurement and


acquisition policy. And then, of course, that all filters down in the Army to the SSM to execute, under the direction of the DASA(P). I am his point person to execute the mission requirements


that


comply with DOD and Army goals to improve services tradecraft.


Q. In terms of what BBP was able to accomplish in the first several years, is there an example of cost avoidance or cost savings that jumps to mind?


A. Based on the guidance issued, a key part of this was all of the services estab- lishing governance. We have the SSM’s offices and portfolio coordinators on my staff. Ten, in the field, we have the com- mand service executives, general officers or Senior Executive Service members, in each of the requiring activities; they oversee everything that is being done to achieve savings or cost avoidance. In the field with them, we have DA-designated portfolio managers, people on selected commands’ staffs who help us plan, track and execute the services oversight.


So what you are looking at is the requirements to support


their missions.


Te commands actually provide us with projections and forecasts of what they believe they will be able to do to reduce requirements while still supporting their mission and without degrading their capabilities. At of


the United


the AUSA [Association States Army Annual


Meeting and Exposition, in October 2012], the secretary of the Army noted that at that point, we had about $333 million in savings.


Basically what takes place is that the


commands reported the requirements they had in FY12. Tey projected to save about $600 million with services over- all. Tat is everything minus RDT&E [research, development, test and evalua- tion] and construction; BBP 1.0 exempted those areas.


ASC.ARMY.MIL


85


CONTRACTING


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168