FIGURE 2
T e savings over time will more than outweigh the startup cost, however. Signifi cant
cost the management of
savings exist in inventory for
maintenance and repair, fi eld support and potentially other areas. T is addition to the
is in effi ciency of building
Integrated Solution
Shared RF Components
compatibility and interoperability into C4ISR/EW capabilities from the start, which avoids having to fi x problems in those areas after fi elding. Finally, modular open hardware and software will enable rapid upgrades to existing capabilities, as well as the insertion of new capabilities that may not even have been considered.
T e next generation of COE will refl ect a paradigm shift in C4ISR/EW capability
development. Implementing Interface Standards Shared Processing
Common Chassis
this new approach would pose signifi cant challenges, but with the growing reliance of our Army on technology, can we really aff ord not to continue to push the status quo and advance COE?
Over time, the Army can reach a fully integrated solution for a COE by standardizing software and hardware interfaces and then moving to shared components, common chassis and shared processing. (SOURCE: CERDEC)
systems poses a complex problem requir- ing further research and development. Few vendors have entered this arena because of these challenges. No vendor has met the end-state objective of a fully integrated solution. While not the ultimate answer, the SCA provides an excellent starting point for next-generation C4ISR/EW capabilities. Modifi cations will be required to support simultaneous C4ISR/EW operations, and EW and ISR.
CONCLUSION T e Army faces not only technical chal- lenges when implementing approach
this new in developing C4ISR/EW capabilities, but also acquisition and cost
ASC.ARMY.MIL 75 challenges. Individual systems can no
longer be developed in isolation. PMs and PEOs will have to work together from the start of development through testing, fi elding and maintaining in the fi eld to ensure that all capabilities meet their requirements.
As an alternative, the PEO/PM structure could be modifi ed to support the new architectural
approach. to being a structural In shift,
addition this new
approach will entail an initial startup cost greater than that of a traditional program of record because of the requirement for common hardware and software architectures and new development tools.
MS. JILL SMITH has been the director of CERDEC since October 2010. She plans, directs, manages and executes the Army’s applied science and technology investment in Army programs that span the C4ISR domain. A member of the Senior Executive Service since 2001, Smith holds a B.S. and an M.A. in mathematics, both from Shippensburg State College. She completed additional graduate work in statistics and electrical engineering at the University of Delaware. Smith is Level 3 certified in systems planning, research development and engineering (SPRDE) – systems engineering and Level 2 certified in SPRDE – program systems engineering.
For more information regarding the CERDEC perspective on COE, contact the CERDEC Corporate and Public Communication Office at 443-861-7566.
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168