search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FROM THE PENTAGON Federal News Radio host Jerod Serbu interviews Hallock on May 14 at the Pentagon, for “On DOD,” a weekly one-hour show that focuses on the programs and policies that affect the Defense Department. (Photo by Kathie Scarrah, ODASA(P))


of when a typical day at the office should have begun.


I have never served in the military, nor has the Army asked me as a civilian to deploy in a “boots on the ground” capacity, but I can say that the pride and exhilaration I felt that night as the con- tracting officer in direct support of those at the tip of the spear gave me a sense of accomplishment that I will never forget. Jan. 17, 1991, was my personal testament that our actions in contracting make a difference and contribute to the suc- cess of our men and women who serve in uniform. I am reminded of this every day as I see the tremendous effort our contracting workforce puts forth and the amazing successes.


EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY Before Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom, we didn’t have the


pressures and challenges of learning “on the go,” as so many of our contracting professionals do today. We tended to think of our business


During in terms of effi-


ciency more than effectiveness. Te dollar amount of obligations and the number of contract actions executed back then were about one-fourth of what our folks must execute today.


We didn’t realize how significant an impact downsizing the workforce in the 1990s would have on contracting actions some 25 years later, or how the workload pendulum would swing back so dramati- cally as we contracted for contingencies in two theaters at the same time, all while technology and automation made the job faster if not necessarily easier. As a result, we didn’t allow for an orderly plan to downsize the workforce; frankly, we had no concrete expectation that the pace of contracting would increase.


the wars in Southwest Asia,


Congress stood up the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, the Com- mission on Wartime Contracting and the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction—three organizations with oversight of our contingency contracting efforts—to assure the American public that we were contracting smartly and were being held accountable. Tese and other oversight organizations found that the Army was relatively proficient in executing contracts but delinquent in administering them, especially in oversight of the large number of service contracts that directly supported the war effort.


We were effective, but not so efficient. Yet, I believe we couldn’t have accomplished what we did in support of our Soldiers, nor turned around our imbalance of effectiveness at the cost of efficiency, if not for the professional, trained civilian and military contracting cadre that got


ASC.ARMY.MIL 107


COMMENTARY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161