search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TAPPING SUSTAINMENT LESSONS Soldiers with the 545th Transportation Harbormaster Detachment and the 73rd Signal Company set up the Harbormaster Command and Control Center (HCCC) July 8 at Ford Island, Joint Base Pearl Harbor – Hickam, HI, for the biennial Rim of the Pacific 2014 exercise. HCCC, a mobile and deployable system that can track and communicate with any ship and vessel entering or exiting a particular port within 10 nautical miles, is set to transition to sustainment Oct. 1. PEO C3T plans to expand the knowledge capture program to interview individuals who may not be leaving the organization but possess knowledge in a specific area that’s in demand, such as the transition to sustainment. (Photo by SSG Gaelen Lowers, 8th Theater Sustainment Command)


• “From an acquisition lessons-learned perspective, what advice would you give to your successor? To someone just entering the Acquisition Corps?”


Te written responses serve as the founda- tion for a more detailed discussion during the one-hour, in-person exit interviews, which cover situations and circumstances the key leaders dealt with while work- ing for the PEO. Some lessons identified during this process are tied to specific decision points in the programs’ acquisi- tion life cycles; however, more deal with day-to-day operations, and it may not be immediately obvious that there is a les- son in how the situation or circumstance was handled. Tat’s where the interviews hold so much value. Te program analyst reviews the initial written responses and prepares follow-up questions for clarifica- tion. Tis interaction often uncovers pearls of wisdom that the organization can then capture and share via the ALLP database.


Each interview subject brings a distinct personality to the process: One person


may write lengthy paragraphs and have little to add in person, whereas another might be an expansive conversationalist but offer only generalities on the toughest subjects. Our challenge is to encourage honesty by putting them at ease—the sessions are not recorded, and the con- tent submitted to AMSAA does not have the source’s name attached—and to dis- till the voluminous input into organized pieces for database entry and consump- tion by other members of the workforce.


RESULTS AND PATH AHEAD While the program is still in the early stages, the knowledge captures thus far have been a rewarding and instructive experience for both the interlocutors and those answering the questions. Te effort has increased the amount and quality of information we submit to the ALLP, as well as additional lessons learned that we will distribute within the PEO.


PEO C3T has 48 lessons in the ALLP database; of those, 20 were developed from three interviews conducted in June.


More interviews took place in August, with additional interviews planned.


One such lesson covers a program’s successful sustainment preparation, cul- minating in a Milestone D-type review with senior leadership that brought together key stakeholders in ASA(ALT) and U.S. Army Materiel Command. Te briefing prompted the organiza- tions to make realistic decisions about sustainment plans and costs, leading to formalized, executable agreements and a 40 percent reduction in life-cycle sustain- ment costs.


Tat same interviewee provided firsthand experience to encourage iden- tifying data requirements, planning tests to obtain the needed information and capturing this information in the Test and Evaluation Master Plan, as well as


leveraging other planned events to


overcome data deficits. Another lesson details one project manager’s efforts to engage U.S. Army Contracting Com- mand personnel by inviting them to


ASC.ARMY.MIL 19


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161