search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CHANGING MISSION, CHALLENGING CLIMATE


WITH THE GROWTH IN THE CONTRACTING WORKLOAD AND THE PROLIFERATION OF ORGANIZATIONS HANDLING IT CAME A MASSIVE INCREASE IN REGULATION, POLICY AND GUIDANCE OVER THE LAST THREE DECADES.


and FY11, more than 5,200 audits and inspections of Army contracting offices were conducted. Audits have created a climate of concern among young practi- tioners, making them very conservative in their approach to contracting. Another unintended consequence of too many audits is that they tend to divert the focus of the staff to audit findings and correc- tive action plans, leaving less time and fewer resources to execute the current workload. Tis tends to have the opposite effect than the audits intended.


While the Army’s Office of Business Transformation has made great strides to improve the organizational effectiveness and efficiency of many Army commands, there are still many opportunities for improvement in the contracting commu- nity. LTG Tomas W. Spoehr, director, Army Office of Business Transformation, summed it up in his article, “Change in Order to Stay ‘Army Strong,’ ” in the April 2014 issue of the U.S. Army Com- bined Arms Center’s Military Review, arguing that changing the culture to bet- ter value the efficient use of resources is critical to our survival. “We have the best


114


Army in the world, but continued success is not assured. We must transform the way we operate in order to remain Army Strong,” Spoehr wrote.


To that end, my last effort as I wrap up my 37-year career in Army contracting is to bring a culture of continuous process improvement


(CPI)


to Army contract-


ing. It starts with documenting our processes. Using a Lean Six Sigma (LSS) approach to contracting, we can deliver outstanding service to our requiring activities, turning our customers


into


raving fans. Communicating what we do and how we do it is critical to our ability to deliver much-needed supplies and services to our Army.


It seems that our contracting community spends more time dealing with problems, performing re-work and putting out the fires we start, than investing the time and energy in CPI. We must consolidate the many scattered initiatives, aiming to improve contracting processes under the CPI umbrella so that the resulting changes can become part of our cul- ture without continually reinventing the wheel. Fundamentally, CPI is about spending resources proactively instead of reactively. But there is so much more to CPI than training or completing LSS projects: also important are getting stake- holder buy-in up front, considering the voice of our customers, preparing the leadership to be champions of change and rolling out great products in a way that ensures that new processes and pro- cedures are understood, anticipated and embraced.


CONCLUSION Over my three-plus decades


in Army


contracting, I’ve seen many changes, and the time for another big change is at hand. We must change our culture now no matter how difficult—the risk is too


Army AL&T Magazine October–December 2014


great not to. In the current climate of personnel shortages and budget cuts, we must dedicate our precious resources to standardizing and documenting our pro- cesses, defining roles and responsibilities, and becoming proactive rather than reac- tive. Tis is the only way to be a more efficient organization. I wholeheartedly echo the words of LTG Spoehr: “If we are unable to change the way we operate, then we fundamentally risk our Soldiers’ lives by sending them to conflict unpre- pared due to a lack of basic resources to properly train and equip them.”


Budget cuts are driving a big change. A study of Army contracting organizational alignment is underway at the request of the secretary of the Army. A bill currently before Congress mandates CPI. Consoli- dating a single HCA under GEN Via is driving standardization. Tese three things will serve as great conduits for change. Te


contracting workforce of


today is very dynamic and accustomed to rapid implementation of change, whether in organizational structure, policy or technology solutions. I am very excited about the future of Army contracting and proud to count myself among this highly skilled group of Army professionals.


For more information about Army contract- ing, go to www.us.army/acc.


MR. J.R. RICHARDSON served in numer- ous senior Army civilian leadership positions throughout his 37-year contracting career. He was director of contracting operations at ACC from 2010 until his retirement at the end of September. He received a B.S. in business from Stillman College. He is Level III certified in contracting and is a member of the Army Acquisition Corps.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161