search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
$


would include partnerships between acquisition and requirements and among acquisition, technology and the operating communities, “so all those communities are working together to help speed transi- tion of technology back to the warfighter.”


THE IMPORTANCE OF COMPETITION Kendall also emphasized the value of competition. “It’s the best single thing we can do to get costs down for the govern- ment.” He quickly noted that competition is not always possible, “but where we can … have head-to-head, direct competi- tion, we’ll continue to create what I call


‘competitive environments’ ” in which companies have to “worry about some- body taking your business.” Tat, he said, keeps companies on their toes and makes them better—not only for DOD but for their other customers as well.


Gansler agreed, noting several studies showing that competition among ven- dors during the 1960s and 1970s had reduced net costs by 12-50 percent. He also pointed up the difference between the way that DOD procures


services


and materiel, joking, “Do you think that buying an engineer is the same as buy- ing a tank? … You don’t put the engineer through live-fire testing.” Buying tanks, services and information technology are vastly different, he said, and there should be different practices and policies for each. However, “all of our practices, all of our policies are built around buying goods, and yet more than 50 percent of dollars go to buying services.”


According to Kendall, the procurement of services will continue to get a lot of attention. “I think we’re making prog- ress,” he said, “but there’s more to be done.” Small business will continue to be a part of that, he said, as well as a part of pushing innovation.


FILLING THE GAP


SSG Jason Mitchell works with CW2 John Galeotos during the 2014 Cyber Shield exercise at the Professional Education Center in North Little Rock, AR, May 2. While DAWDF and other measures have been effective in improving the professionalism and training of the acquisition workforce, attention must be focused on replacing retiring members with qualified, experienced personnel. (Photo by CPT Kyle Key)


THE PROFESSIONAL WORKFORCE In improving the professionalism of the workforce, Kendall said, the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act requirements have become bureaucratic, and he’d like to do away with some of the


“check-the-box approach to demonstrat- ing proficiency in acquisition.” He’d like to see more meaningful ways to demon- strate proficiency. Acquisition, he said, is a fundamentally “human endeavor” that requires great professionalism and exper- tise to do well. “Tat’s true across a lot of career fields. It starts in engineering and engineering management and program management. … Tere are a number of places where professionalism really matters.”


Integral to the development of that professionalism, he said, is the contin- ued funding “of DAWDF, the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. …Tis fund has become so impor- tant for building professionalism. It was used initially to increase the size of the workforce. It is being used now to make key hires for key losses. …It’s also being used now a lot for training, for improving professionalism. DAWDF is enormously valuable to us. So we don’t need as large a fund…but keeping it going, I think, is a very, very helpful thing.”


Gansler expressed concern about the loss of qualified acquisition professionals,


“not just for DOD but across the overall government. …Te aging workforce is …


ASC.ARMY.MIL


93


BBP 2.0


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161