search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FROM MINDS TO MARKETS


116 patents assigned to the secretary of the Army dating back to the 1970s—the record for an Army employee, accord- ing to the Patent and Trademark Office database.


COST BENEFITS FOR DOD


“Typically, the DOD’s investment in a new defense-related product, licensed from a DOD lab, is only around 15 per- cent of the total investment necessary,” said Swanson. “By licensing to industry, DOD can offload the large expense of converting an early-state prototype into a final product. It’s a very cost-effective way to acqure cutting-edge technology.”


Many products derived from Army inventions have both military and civil- ian applications. In those cases, the Army frequently saves money on procurement because it benefits from manufacturing economies of scale. Where there is a siz- able commercial market for a dual-use product, the Army will need to spend far less on acquiring that product than if it contracted with the defense industry to develop it. For example, rate-actuated tethers invented at ARL, which stretch and relax easily at normal stress but pro- vide dramatically increased resistance


force when pulled quickly, are being explored by small businesses for health care and sports applications. (See “Per Vivo Labs warms to tech transfer,” Page 183.)


“Contracting with a prime supplier for a custom design and production of a defense product


is usually far more


expensive,” Swanson said. “By patent- ing its inventions, the Army also protects itself from defense contractors and others laying claim to a technology,” he added.


“Without patent protection, the Army and other branches can end up paying twice for a product—once for the origi- nal R&D, and a second time by paying the contractor a premium price to use the patents that should belong to the DOD.”


Finally, when licensing its inventions to industry for commercial use, the Army earns revenue and is no longer respon- sible for patent maintenance costs.


CONCLUSION Partnerships between the private sector and the Army’s science and technology community benefit the warfighter and the American taxpayer, and help grow the national economy.


COOL CUSTOMERS


This insulated container for cold beverages, a high-tech ice chest that keeps water bottles cool far longer than existing ice chests, is one of 112 technologies developed by NSRDEC that are available for licensing. (U.S. Army photo by David Kamm, NSRDEC)


“Businesses provide upfront


payments


and ongoing royalties on the inventions they license. Tat enhances the return on the R&D investment while keeping the fighting force at a technological advan- tage,” said Swanson. “And by bringing industry partners into the fold, TechLink helps the Army’s science and technology community continue to innovate in ways that benefit the acquisition workforce.”


For more information, go to http:// techlinkcenter.org or contact Will Swear- ingen at wds@montana.edu.


MR. THOMAS MULKERN is chief of the Technology Transfer and Outreach Office at ARL, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. He is responsible for directing technology transfer programs as well as support


for outreach programs in science,


technology, engineering and mathematics. He holds an M.S. in plastics engineering from the University of Massachusetts and a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University. He has published dozens of technical papers on polymer matrix composite research, and holds one U.S. patent. He is Level II certified in program management.


MR. TROY CARTER is the senior writer and editor at TechLink. He provides origi- nal reporting on technology transfer, visual media and marketing activity in support of the DOD laboratory system. He holds an M.A. in political science from American University of Beirut and a B.A. in politi- cal science from the American University in Cairo. He is a former infantry sergeant and combat veteran from the Army’s 10th Mountain Division, serving in Afghanistan in 2003-04 and in Iraq in 2005-06.


+


182


Army AL&T Magazine


January-March 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276