DOTmLPF + dotMlpf = DOTMLPF
and limitations of this particular materiel solution, leading to recommendations to make the system better.
The ACD capability assessment had two whether the capability was operationally relevant while providing supporting data
to a Capabilities Development
for Rapid Transition submission and/ or development of a Joint Capabilities Integration Development System (JCIDS) document; and second, to provide data to update the initial capability concept of operation, enabling follow-on units to
The Maneuver Battle Lab (MBL) goals were to observe the employment of APMI, compare it to other precision munitions, and use this information for an existing study on mortar employment. During the process, TRADOC pulled the Infantry Mortar Leader Course, the Soldier Requirements Division of the Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE), and the Fires Center of Excellence (FCoE) Directorate of Training and Doctrine to round out the team. One member from the Product Manager Guided Precision Munitions and Mortar
Systems of
(PEO Ammo) also embedded in the team as programmatic and technical liaison (see Figure 1).
METHODOLOGY Working together, the commands iden- the
collective purpose. With these
developed a set of three surveys: one teams, and one for the leaders from the platoon through brigade combat team levels. The team leveraged the existing infrastructure with the ATEC FOA team and put into place a concept to conduct the assessment.
APMI Forward Operational Graphic Figure 1
With the ATEC FOA team and an ARCIC remainder of the assessment team deployed to Kandahar. There, the combined team split into four multifunctional teams with representation from the
various
elements and conducted data collection on Oct. 7-21, 2011, at 16 different forward operating bases and combat outpost locations across units in Regional Command (RC)-East and RC-South.
At the end of data collection, the team reunited in Kandahar, populated the database, cross-leveled information, and began formulating initial impressions
As of this
this writing, effort the published so
reports far,
from which
can be requested from the respective organization, are:
Tasked to conduct a capability assessment of the Accelerated Precision Mortar Initiative once Program Executive Office Ammunition (PEO Ammo) had fielded the new munition in theater, the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) contacted the U.S. Army Training and Evaluation Command (ATEC), and the two embarked on a cooperative forward operational assessment (FOA). Elements of both TRADOC and ATEC took part, and a representative of PEO Ammo’s Product Manager Guided Precision Munitions and Mortar Systems (PM PGM2S) served as a programmatic and technical liaison. (SOURCE: MAJ Marcus Grimes, ATEC.)
ARCIC Initial Impressions Report, Oct. 31, 2011.
ATEC Forward Operational Assessment Report, Nov. 10, 2011.
ARCIC Initial Assessment Report, Nov. 30, 2011.
100
Army AL&T Magazine
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170
