A HUB for LESSONS LEARNED
AMSAA establishes a place to collect successes, analyze failures, and share best practices from acquisition programs
by Alex Karahalis, James “Chip” Herrell, and John G. Thomas M 92 any different entities across the Army have
acquisition-like lessons learned, but the lack of - riel acquisition enterprise leaves the acquisition
workforce with no realistic way to track successes, analyze failures, and develop best practices and lessons learned from past programs.
The Final Report of the 2010 Army Acquisition Review, Army Strong: Equipped, Trained and Ready (online at http://usarmy.
vo.llnwd.net/e2/c/downloads/213465.pdf), reviewed seven key areas of the Army enterprise and provided recommenda- tions for improvement. One such area concerned acquisition program lessons learned.
The review stated, “There is no database to guide one to appropriate programs, issues, trends, solutions and successes in acquisition programs.” It highlighted the need to facilitate understanding and provide the basis for making improvements. Many companies in private industry have developed knowledge management (KM) programs to collect corporate wisdom, thus
preventing “brain drain” and enhancing effectiveness through collaboration. The value of KM is reduced when no analysis is done on the data collected. A successful KM program must show the user immediate value and encourage collaboration.
The Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) is a
CALL has done an excellent job in its mission to “facili- tate rapid adaptation initiatives and conduct focused knowledge sharing.” A similar entity could work toward accom- plishing the same goal for the Army materiel acquisition enterprise. On Jan. 8, the Army Acquisition Executive (AAE), in response to the Army Acquisition Review’s recommendation, signed a memo- randum directing the Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA) to “create a web-enabled database for Acquisition Les- sons Learned and provide analytical capability to conduct the analysis.” The memo tasked program, project, and product man- agers (PMs) of all Acquisition Category programs to conduct an after-action review (AAR) after all milestone events and program terminations, and to submit these lessons through the website, to share them with the acquisition community.
Army AL&T Magazine
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170