search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


(FAPIIS) just like a human would—except much faster.


BANK AUTOMATING SUCCESS


Robotic process automation can easily automate a straightforward, repeatable process, thus increasing compliance and saving time and resources. (Image by Yuichiro Chino/Getty Images)


A pilot or proof-of-concept of the new technology allows the workforce to see firsthand how the technology works. Te true benefit of a pilot program is to allow the technology’s capability to speak for itself. Tat way, the workforce has the opportunity to experience how the tech- nology saves them time and improves accuracy. Once the technology demon- strates value—even if just in a few targeted locations—word will spread about the benefits, and then others will clamor to adopt the technology, too. As with all things, adapting to even small or incre- mental changes takes time.


Two civilian agencies have individually piloted similar “contractor responsibility determination” solutions using robotic process automation. Tis robotic process automation—or “bot” for short—is able to pull information from public websites such as the System for Award Management (SAM) and the Federal Awardee Perfor- mance and Integrity Information System


In order for a bot to work effectively, a bot technician simply enters, or records, the exact process that a contracting profes- sional would ordinarily take, right down to mouse clicks, typing of data, screen- shots and pulling of reports. In this case, the process entails navigating to the SAM. gov and FAPIIS.gov websites, typing in a unique vendor number, also known as a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number, and checking each website’s database for results and infor- mation indicating whether the contractor is registered in each system in order to do business with the federal govern- ment, does not have any active exclusions (such as suspension or debarment) and is otherwise capable of receiving a federal contract award.


To launch this process with the bot, a contracting professional provides the bot with a DUNS number for each contractor (via email or other electronic means), then the bot takes over the task from there: It enters each DUNS number into both the SAM and FAPIIS websites, creates screen- shot reports from the information listed in the sites, populates a document with the results for each vendor that it finds, and sends the results to a contracting special- ist—in no more than four minutes.


In September, the Army awarded a contract to procure a “contractor responsibility determination” bot to enable contracting professionals to shift their focus from low- value administrative tasks like checking SAM.gov for a given contractor’s regis- tration, to high-value, critical-thinking areas of their work such as negotiations and cost analysis. Once the Army demon- strates success of the bot, it plans to extend use of it to other DOD and federal agen- cies. Tat way, multiple federal agencies


will have the opportunity to leverage and share in the Army’s success of a stream- lined process. Federal agencies are banding together to divide and conquer other aspects of acquisition ripe for automation, such as searching government systems for contractors’ past performance informa- tion, or auto-populating required Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses for specific types of requirements.


SAVE THE SPECIALISTS AND DELIVER CAPABILITY Contract specialists and contracting offi- cers often manage critical and diverse portfolios of contract requirements for various customers, stakeholders and requiring activities. Usually, each requir- ing activity and stakeholder views the contracting aspect of the acquisition process as the final speed bump to deliv- ering capability or completing the mission. Delivering capability in the Army means delivering lethality and readiness to our Soldiers.


Most contracting professionals are used to an urgent, high-tempo work environ- ment. Robotic process automation has the power to dramatically cut time and reduce unnecessary stress in an often cumbersome acquisition process. In this case, robotic process automation enables contracting professionals to be more productive with their time by allowing them to use their critical-thinking skills on complex cost analysis for procuring weapon systems or conducting multifac- eted negotiations, rather than spending time waiting for multiple websites to load or re-entering the same information into several forms or systems.


For example, it usually takes a contract- ing professional up to an hour to complete a contractor responsibility determination process. Tis tedious task is a required part of the acquisition process that a


https://asc.ar my.mil 115


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176