search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HOW TO CONVINCE THE ARMY TO GET WHAT YOU NEED


development efforts rather than commercial alternatives. Effectively, the results of the Army’s market research made it impossible for another source to offer a commercial item to satisfy its requirements.


2. ADEQUACY Information Ventures


(B-294267)


Issue: Was the agency’s limited search of the potential small business market reasonable?


Despite interest by six small businesses resulting from a pre-solicitation notice, a request for proposals was not set aside for small businesses, but instead was issued unre- stricted as the result of market research.


From that, the


contracting officer determined that


there was no reason-


able expectation that two or more small businesses could perform the work.


The record indicates that the contracting officer failed to take into account known infor- mation indicating the interest of capable small businesses in this procurement.


Lesson learned: In a ruling issued in October 2004, GAO held that the contracting offi- cer did not reasonably consider a small business set-aside and failed to take into account information from the market research report that indicated interest from small businesses.


Inc.


Te requiring activity (the organization with the need) should craft the capabil- ity information (the description of what is needed) to be submitted by industry; iden- tify form, fit and function descriptions; review industry capability statements; revise government performance work statements or statements of work based on industry responses; and determine applicability of commercial items and modifications to commercial items to meet the agency’s need.


The contracting officer should issue pre-solicitation notices—requests


for


information and sources sought, and draft requests for proposals—to promote early exchanges of information; host pre-solicitation conferences to involve potential offerors early in the acquisition process; and conduct other means of stim- ulating industry involvement. All of the tools just mentioned are pre-solicitation notices, and there is no particular order in which they should be done—market research is conducted appropriate to the circumstances, so any number of the notice techniques may be used.


Experts, such as industrial specialists and intellectual property attorneys, should be part of the acquisition team as required.


In market research, we want to gather all of the pertinent information on whatever the capability is, whether it’s simple trash collection services or biological dyses- thesia dysfunction studies or helicopters. Te intent is to identify the availability and capability of commercial products or services that meet the Army’s require- ments and mission needs.


CONCLUSION Te role of market research is to help the government identify companies that have the potential to meet the govern- ment’s requirements. Tat research is


46 Army AL&T Magazine Winter 2020


flawed when we neglect to fully inves- tigate possible commercially available alternatives to meet Army requirements. Te lack of knowledge of the requirement, the commercial market and industry’s capability impact decisions related to full and open competition.


When we think we know what we want, or may have formed a predetermined conclu- sion on the product, service or vendor, we risk not obtaining the full value of exper- tise and innovation that may be available in the commercial market—as well as the risk of being thought of as a lunatic.


For more information on market research and its impact on competition in contracting, go to https://spcs3.kc.army.mil/asaalt/ procurement/SitePages/NewTraining. aspx. A common access card is needed to access the site.


DENNIS P. LONGO is advocate for competition, task and delivery order ombudsman, and senior procurement analyst at the U.S. Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.


A member III of the Army


Acquisition Corps, he holds a bachelor’s degree from University of Baltimore, and is Level


certified in contracting and


in acquisition. His assignments include acquisition


specialist at the Program


Manager for Chemical Demilitarization within the U.S. Army Chemical Materials Activity and procurement analyst at the U.S. Army Legal Services Agency. He served in the Army from 1971 to 1973 at the Southern European Task Force, Italy, and was deployed to Iraq as a civilian in 2003. He authored the Defense Acquisition University Continuous Learning DOD Purchase Card Tutorial in 2003, and has been teaching courses on competition in contracting since 2004.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176