search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REDEFINING THE NETWORK


In the face of potential peer and near-peer threats, the Army needs dynamic and flexible network re-provisioning capabilities to reflect changes in mission and assigned units.


Additionally, the network will need to have a fallback to compensate for degraded network emergencies, when the tactical network systems on the battle- field can’t “talk” to the remote network routing controller. To offset these scenar- ios, software-defined networking solutions will need to incorporate capabilities such as initialization data products and basic router configurations that reside locally, which the tactical network system can leverage until stronger network connec- tions to the remote intelligent routing controller are restored.


THE SEARCH FOR TAILORED SOLUTIONS Under an other-transaction authority rapid acquisition process, which lever- ages Soldier feedback, experimentation and prototyping, the Program Exec- utive Office for Command, Control and Communications – Tactical (PEO C3T) is experimenting with commercial software-defined networking technolo- gies at its integration facilities at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Addition- ally, in late September, supported by the 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry, the Army assessed proto- type software-defined networking and software-defined wide area network- ing software loaded onto the unit’s new at-the-halt tactical network hardware (fifth-generation technical insertion proto- types that the unit is currently piloting), at Fort Stewart, Georgia. Results from


120 Army AL&T Magazine Winter 2020


this experimentation effort are helping to inform software-defined networking design decisions and use cases—a set of possible sequences reflecting how users will employ the capabilities.


As the efforts evolve, PEO C3T plans to leverage an open-standard design for


easy integration—and to avoid


proprietary designs or commitment to particular vendors—to spur innova- tion while keeping costs down through increased competition. System developers from the Army acquisition and research communities are working closely with industry to ensure that they understand the degraded signal challenges in the Army’s network, which are much greater than in commercial networks, as well as other specific objectives so that they can provide us with more tailored solutions. Tese objectives include:


• Assisting the Army in rapidly provi- sioning tactical network nodes. Software-defined networking exper- imentation has shown decreased provisioning time, especially when paired with virtualization and contain- erization, which further reduces the overall data size and speed of provisioning.


• Supporting rapid unit task reorga- nization. The Army needs dynamic, f lexible re-provisioning to ref lect changes in mission and assigned units.


This functional gap extends beyond the traditional software-defined networking capabilities and needs to allow for the tailoring of each tactical network device.


• Optimizing routing in the tacti- cal network. There is a need for software-defined networking to behave opportunistically. Because of the Army’s degraded network challenges, software- defined wide area networking solutions must enhance the network when the remote network controller is available, and enable nodes to operate indepen- dently when it is not available.


• Simplifying network manage- ment. Experimentation reveals that centralizing and automating network conf iguration changes makes it easier for the network node opera- tors on the ground. However, network management, including configuration changes, can still be quite complex for the centralized signal Soldier team to execute. There is opportunity to auto- mate many of these functions.


• Increasing security in the tacti- cal network. The Army is looking at software-defined networking to assist in rapid cyber response through central- izing the ability to conduct changes to security policy, patching and config- urations to support defensive cyber operations. This would enable Soldiers at the remote centralized controller location to send out patches or updates throughout the entire network.


Te Army understands that to receive better, more tailored solutions from industry, it needs to share open appli- cation programming interfaces and use cases in areas that could potentially be supported by commercial off-the-shelf products. Tese include interfaces for accessing initialization data; integrating to


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176