search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE CONTRACTING PENDULUM


In 1974, Congress passed legislation to establish the Office of Federal Procure- ment Policy (OFPP) within the Office of Management and Budget. OFPP provides direction for government-wide procure- ment policies, regulations and procedures; it also promotes economy, efficiency and effectiveness in the acquisition process. One way in which OFPP provides this direction is through the Federal Acquisi- tion Regulation (FAR).


Te FAR, implemented in 1984, provides uniform policies and procedures governing federal government contracts. Accompanied by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), these regulatory policies inun- date contracting professionals and industry partners. In 1984, Congress also passed the Compe- tition in Contracting Act. Tat act requires competition for award of all government contracts. Te theory is that more competition for procurements reduces costs and allows more small businesses to win federal government contracts. It also established that if a protest is submitted to the U.S. Govern- ment Accountability Office (GAO) before contract award, the awarding of the contract will be suspended until GAO rules on the protest.


systems be replaced with an electronic contracting system within five years.


CONTRACTING REFORM INITIATIVES Acquisition reform is important and provides a check and a balance between regulatory accountability and agile acqui- sition. Because of recent reform initiatives, the contracting pendulum has swung from complex to streamlined contracting processes, providing for efficient and rapid acquisition in support of the warfighter.


and eliminate duplication of efforts across agencies. An example of strategic sourc- ing for the Army is in the procurement of commercial hardware and software purchases under the CHESS (Computer Hardware, Enterprise Software and Solu- tions) program.


Of 312 authorities identified in the FAR and DFARS, the Army delegated 159 authorities to a level lower than the assistant secretary of


the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology. This increased efficiency.


In 1994, Congress passed the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act. Tat legis- lation established a preference for the use of commercial products and exempted commercial products from various stat- utory and regulatory requirements. It raised the ceiling for the use of “simpli- fied purchase procedures” and raised the threshold for issuance synopsis. It exempted the micro-purchase from virtually all statutory requirements, and it required that paper-based contracting


36 Army AL&T Magazine Winter 2020


In 2005, OMB asked the OFPP to identify goods and services the govern- ment can purchase more effectively and efficiently through strategic sourcing. Stra- tegic sourcing is an approach to supply chain management that formalizes the way information is gathered and used so that an organization can leverage its consolidated purchasing power to find the best possible values in the marketplace. As a result, the U.S. General Services Administration and Department of the Treasury established the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative to address government- wide opportunities to strategically source commonly purchased goods and services


Ten, in December 2014, OFPP issued a memorandum that directed agencies to take specific actions to implement category management, an approach based on indus- try leading practices, to further streamline and manage entire categories of spending across government more like a single enterprise. (See “Te Power of the Purchase,” Page 134.) Tis approach includes stra- tegic sourcing along with a broader set of strategies, such as develop- ing common standards in practices and contracts, and improving data analysis and information sharing to better leverage the government’s buying power and reduce unneces- sary contract duplication.


Te NDAA passed in 2016 stream- lined the acquisition process and eliminated redundant and duplica- tive requirements. Section 809 of the NDAA required that the secre-


tary of defense establish a nine-member advisory panel consisting of experts in acquisition and procurement policy. Te objective of the panel is to review DOD’s acquisition regulations and provide recom- mendations for streamlining procurement.


Some of the significant recommen- dations made by the panel include expanding and clarifying the use of other-transaction authority for produc- tion. Other-transaction authority is the term commonly used to refer to DOD’s authority to carry out “certain prototype, research and production projects” other than contracts. Such authority gives


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176