search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UNDERSTANDING ARMY ACQUISITION


All of these entities (under the umbrella of the U.S. Army) share the goal of find- ing world-leading technology to improve command, control and situational aware- ness on the battlefield. Any one of them would benefit from a consolidated data- base that allowed them to build on the previous work of colleagues. A database that tied in the efforts from sister services (the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research, and DOD), would be even more effective, as all of these offices play a role in the interna- tional arena.


A secondary benefit of using an aggregated database to track ongoing work is the abil- ity to keep up with who owns the state of the art in either research or technology. Research journals highlight universities that conduct world-class research and countries that are focused on building fundamental and applied research infra- structure. Databases can quickly leverage analytics to chew through, say, published and peer-reviewed academic papers worldwide. Te U.S. Navy’s bibliometric analysis tool does this, and ITCs have used it to identify the most promising interna- tional universities with which to engage. Analytic tools can refine potential partners for collaborative engagement, though they are most effective when their outputs are vetted by seasoned experts—almost like using Google’s language translation algo- rithms. Users can get a basic translation from them, but to achieve an accurate translation, it is better if users already understand the language’s nuances.


A truly useful management tool would capture past and present government projects, a rundown of leading industry for developed technologies and the most highly rated international universities for basic and early applied research. Tis would allow a new ITC director, program manager, or research center scientist to


quickly determine where to apply their efforts for maximum effect. Te biggest challenge would be establishing access criteria and classification levels.


WE MEAN BUSINESS Te importance of ITCs cannot be over- stated. At times, the director of an ITC represents the breadth of the Army’s science and technology across the table from a foreign partner. To bring that science and technology enterprise to bear, ITCs need to be empowered to reach out to key leaders throughout the research and development and acquisition


communities. Tose key leaders must also be aware that their decisions to engage internationally may produce technologi- cal progress, but also political messaging. Tis is a secondary mission that ITCs bear: communication with the U.S. State Department, DOD, and their foreign equivalents to ensure that collaborative research and development sends (or some- times, doesn’t send) a message to partners and the rest of the world. ITCs don’t have the resources to shape political messages, but they must be wary of how their work might be construed and advise senior lead- ers accordingly.


Innovation internationally speaking: How ITCs demonstrate ingenuity


Innovation means solving a problem in a unique or creative way. ITCs, by definition, are thinking outside of borders, and here are two examples:


1. At the request of Gen. Mark A. Milley, then-chief of staff of the Army, ITCs worked with DASA(DE&C) and NATO partners to gather testing and evaluation data on fielded infantry fighting vehicle systems through existing information exchange agree- ments. This effort provided an “honest broker” evaluation of existing foreign systems, saving procurement, testing and evalua- tion dollars in the search for the Army’s Next Generation Combat Vehicle (cited in the nomination of the CCDC’s Global Technol- ogy Office for the 2019 David Packard Award for Acquisition Excellence), while demonstrating solidarity with our NATO allies.


2. An ITC working with South Korea facilitated a co-developmental agreement that directly helped U.S. forces address a real-world challenge: To keep errant training rounds from leaving the range’s impact area, tracking radar (part of an international collaborative research project) was put in place at Rodriguez Live Fire Complex to track rounds for safety while characterizing radar performance in combined fires environments. This project was a win for U.S. Forces Korea, the engineers of the system and the South Korean people living near the range, located close to the border with North Korea.


https://asc.ar my.mil


59


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176