search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THEN & NOW


encryption, manned-unmanned teaming capabilities and the ability to operate autonomously,” according to a Program Exec- utive Office (PEO) for Aviation press release in 2020. “Designed with a Modular Open Systems Approach, FTUAS payloads will be easily interchangeable. Te FTUAS will be readily deployable using Chinook helicopters and provide commanders more flex- ibility on the battlefield.”


In 2022, the Army awarded an $8 million contract to AeroViron- ment, Inc. to provide its Jump 20 drone for the first increment of FTUAS, and, in the following year, tapped Griffon Aerospace and Textron Systems for the next phase of its rapid prototyp- ing program.


“FTUAS provides the brigade with an organic capability to conduct reconnaissance and surveillance operations that collect, develop and report actionable intelligence, allowing the warfighter to maintain dominance during multidomain operations,” the Army stated in an April 25, 2024 press release. Meaning FTUAS provides transformational capabilities including VTOL, or vertical takeoff and landing, for runway independence, on-the- move command and control, Soldier-led field level maintenance and enables rapid capability insertions, “further allowing the system to keep pace with technology.”


Te first two options included evaluations of system performance, the modular open systems approach, cost, schedule and program risk, culminating in a preliminary design review and critical design review, the press release stated.


Option 3 includes flight demonstrations from Textron’s Aero- sonde Mk 4.8 HQ, and Griffon’s Valiant, modular open systems approach third-party verification as well as Soldier touch points and testing of key systems characteristics such as vertical take- off and landing. Production representative prototypes will be delivered during Option 4 and will culminate in a production readiness review. “Exercising FTUAS Options 3 and 4 simul- taneously allows for the execution of a thorough and deliberate development test plan,” according to PEO Aviation. With “first unit issued” set for 2025.


An Abbreviated Capabilities Development Document was approved on May 17, 2024, setting up a prototyping develop- ment plan for the capability. Due to funding limitations for an accelerated fielding timetable, investments are being made in fiscal year 2025 to purchase prototypes to be flown over the next few years to evaluate their sensors and other features and deter- mine the best options.


https://asc.ar my.mil 115


CONCLUSION From hot-air balloons and early reconnaissance to lethality and MQ-9 Reaper readiness, the slow, but steady, evolution of drones through the decades highlights significant advancements in aerial technology.


Te future of drones is in autonomy, with developments focused on reducing human intervention and increasing operational effi- ciency. Autonomous drones equipped with artificial intelligence algorithms can analyze data in real-time, make decisions and adapt to highly contested environments. Tese advancements, along with continued enhancements in drone technology, will be essential for the Army of 2030 to maintain superiority in modern warfare.


For more information go to https://www.army.mil/PEOAviation.


CHERYL MARINO provides contract support to the U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, as a writer and editor for Army AL&T magazine and TMGL, LLC. Prior to USAASC, she served as a technical report editor at the Combat Capabilities Development Command Center at Picatinny Arsenal for five years. She holds a B.A. in communications from Seton Hall University and has more than 25 years of writing and editing experience in both the government and private sectors.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120