search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND MODERNIZING THE ARMY


At a time when the Army and ATEC needed an efficient OODA loop, legacy systems failed the evaluators doing everything they could to get capability to the field.


available, ATEC’s chief data officers initiated several data pilots, including development on the bias and jitter problem. Redstone Test Center created an application in the ATEC Data Mesh that would automatically ingest raw video files, locate the laser on the target board and calculate its position error. In the past, each two- hour sortie required an average of 10 hours to curate files, trim video and extract information—a process that analysts could not start until the data arrived. Over the course of the JUONS effort, ATEC completed dozens of sorties. Today, after three weeks of effort by Redstone Test Center’s data scientists, a user can load an entire sortie’s video data directly to the ATEC Data Mesh from the field site via our data upload utility HERMES. Te application will automatically identify files, conduct bias and jitter processing, and produce results in minutes. Importantly, that data can be shared with all ATEC’s partners instantly from anywhere as soon as the automated processing is complete. Te ATEC Data Mesh can decrease the turn time of the bias and jitter testing from months to hours. Relevant, timely information to senior Army leaders is a core part of achieving ATEC’s mission. Te ATEC Data Mesh has redefined these terms, enabling us to provide more relevant data at speeds that were never possible.


Tis is not the end for the ATEC Data Mesh: ATEC’s data is a weapon and a force multiplier. In the case of the JUONS, just one additional month to view the JUONS test data and to ask ques- tions would have meant so much to the confidence of a Soldier being sent into harm’s way, entrusting their lives in a system with which they have never flown. Extending this problem set to weapons and munitions, master gunners and technical experts in formations would make use of trustworthy and accessible data to expand the lethality of their fighting formations.


CONCLUSION Te future of warfare relies more heavily on data than ever before. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and more, all require enormous amounts of high-quality data—the kind of data that the ATEC community produces today. In the past, Gebhart would not have had access to this data, but with the ATEC


https://asc.ar my.mil 57


Data Mesh, he can. In turn, ATEC can make this data descrip- tive, predictive and prescriptive, telling Soldiers not just what happened in a test, but describing what might happen in other environments, and how to gain an advantage by using the systems to their maximum extent. By reducing its OODA loop, ATEC can enable Soldiers in the field to reduce theirs.


For more information, contact Maj. Lucas Gebhart at lucas.c.gebhart.mil@army.mil.


MAJ. LUCAS GEBHART is the ATEC deputy chief data and analytics officer. He holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a B.S. in operations research from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. During his career, Gebhart has deployed four times to Iraq and Afghanistan, most recently as a troop commander of the AH-64E Apache troop supporting the Iraqi army in regaining control of


the city of Mosul in 2016-2017.


BLAINE PERRY is the chief data and analytics officer at the U.S. Army Redstone Test Center. He holds an M.S. in business intelligence and data analytics from Carnegie Mellon University and a B.S. in aerospace engineering from the University of Alabama. In 2020, he was selected as a member of the inaugural cohort of the U.S. Army Artificial Intelligence Scholars program, where he spent two years with the U.S. Army Artificial Intelligence Integration Center in Pittsburgh learning how best to leverage artificial intelligence and machine learning within the U.S. Army.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120