search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMODITIZING AL/ML MODELS


PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE, AREAS OF RESEARCH


While AI2C is working with the AI/ML models, West Point is researching the quality that those models need to have to achieve the desired outcome. (Graphic by Hannah Ball, West Point Class of 2024)


the potential to impact units’ budgets, storage space in Supply Support Activities, as well as national supply chains. Because of this, it will be crucial to understand the impacts of AI/ML models on these areas prior to any large-scale implementation for the Army.


CONCLUSION Te transition from physical industrial products to digital software applications has led to major challenges for military technology development and acquisition. Te integration of AI/ML models into these algorithmic tools will only exacer- bate these challenges—not only because modern AI/ML is contingent on software, but also because the stochastic (random- ness or chance) nature of these models makes it difficult to determine what impact they will have on Army organi- zations and processes. Moreover, the state of the art for both software and AI/ML


86 Army AL&T Magazine Fall 2024


moves much faster than traditional tech- nology for military products. As such it will become increasingly important to maintain flexibility and adaptability in procuring AI/ML models. Additionally, while developing those models it will be equally important to determine the level of performance required to achieve the desired operational impacts. Te research and development approach addresses both these challenges and can serve as a model for elsewhere in the Army Acquisition enterprise.


Te Agile software development meth- odologies being leveraged by AI2C, the Army Software Factory, and in other AFC organizations offer a paradigm shift in military technology development. Army development teams, consisting of Army personnel with minimal contrac- tor support, can create modular systems that are model agnostic, allowing for


seamless integration of different AI/ML models as technology evolves. Te AI2C Sustainment team has proven that iterative development with continuous employment by operational units is both possible and effective at delivering incremental value as models and technologies develop. More- over, modular systems built on agile principles are inherently flexible, enabling rapid customization and reconfiguration to meet specific mission needs. By leverag- ing in-house Agile software development, defense acquisition can overcome the chal- lenges posed by the dynamic nature of AI/ ML technologies, ensuring that military systems remain adaptable, responsive and future proof.


In parallel, leveraging model quality


simulations offers a strategic approach to determining the performance require- ments for the AI/ML model. Te research underway by the West Point Department


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120