search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND MODERNIZING THE ARMY


VITAL SIGNS


The first triage system ever cleared by the FDA for assessing hemorrhage risk in trauma patients is powered by AI. How did its inventors ensure it was up to the job?


by Paul Lagasse H


emorrhage, or uncontrolled blood loss, is the lead- ing cause of preventable death among combat casualties, representing approximately 90% of battlefield fatalities. Analysis of data from the


conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan suggests that between 6% and 24% of those fatalities could potentially have survived if their injuries had been more quickly diagnosed and treated. Given that the median survival time from hemorrhage is just two-to-three hours, the window for identification and treatment is narrow.


Combat medics have long known that hemorrhage is associated with increased heart rate and decreased blood pressure. What they lacked, however, was a way to use that data to assess a trauma patient’s hemorrhage risk. A new application developed by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command’s (MRDC) Biotechnology High Performance Computing Soft- ware Applications Institute (BHSAI) promises to fill that gap with the aid of artificial intelligence (AI).


Te Automated Processing of the Physiological Registry for Assessment of Injury Severity Hemorrhage Risk Index, or APPRAISE-HRI, is a smartphone health app that uses AI to quickly assess patients’ vital-sign data and assign them to one of three categories based on their risk of experiencing life-threaten- ing blood loss. In April, APPRAISE-HRI received the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) first-ever regulatory clearance of an application of its kind, also becoming the first AI-enabled software from the DOD ever cleared by the FDA. Te story of


how the BHSAI team collected and refined vital-sign data to train the AI algorithm at the core of the APPRAISE-HRI is a fascinat- ing tale of human-computer interaction that has valuable lessons for the future development of AI tools in military medicine.


COLLECTING AND ANALYZING VITAL-SIGN DATA In 2001, Jaques Reifman, Ph.D., director of BHSAI, first became interested in the problem of whether data collected from the continuous monitoring of vital signs might reveal trends that could be used diagnostically.


“It took time to determine which combination of vital signs we should be using,” said Reifman. “We attempted to develop models with all sorts of potential combinations, which was very time consuming. Ultimately, we used high performance comput- ing to identify systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate as the most useful.”


Te challenge Reifman faced was determining how those vital signs correlated with a patient’s hemorrhage state. He proposed training a machine-learning algorithm on data collected from trauma patients to see what trends appeared. With support from the Defense Health Program, the Advanced Medical Technology Initiative, the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advance- ment of Military Medicine and MRDC’s own Combat Casualty Care Research Program, Reifman and his team undertook three independent studies to collect vital-sign data from adult trauma


https://asc.ar my.mil


47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120