search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sensor


information is provided to the


algorithms responsible for estimating self- motion and interaction with the world. Robots can be programmed with their own versions of mental models, com- plete with mechanisms for learning and adaptation that help encode knowledge about themselves and the environment in which they operate. Rather than “mental models,” we call these “world models.”


‘IN FORM AND MOVING HOW EXPRESS AND ADMIRABLE’ Consider a robot acting while assuming a model of its own motion in the world. If the behavior the robot actually expe- riences deviates significantly from the behavior the robot expects, the discrep- ancy will lead to poor performance: a


“wobbly” robot that is slow and confused, not unlike a human after too many alco- holic beverages. If the actual motion is closer to the anticipated model, the robot can be very quick and accurate with less burden on the sensing aspect to correct for erroneous modeling.


Of course, the environment itself greatly affects how the robot moves through the world. While gravity can fortunately be assumed constant on Earth, other con- ditions can change how a robot might interact with the environment. For instance, a robot traveling through mud would have a much different experi- ence than one moving on asphalt. Te best modeling would be designed to change depending on the environment. We know there are many models to be learned and applied, and the real issue is knowing which model to apply for a given situation.


Robotics today are developed in labora- tory environments with little exposure to the variability of the world outside the lab, which can cause a robot’s abil- ity to perceive and react to fail in the


unstructured outdoors. Limited envi- ronmental exposure during model learning and subsequent poor adapta- tion or performance is said to be the result of “over-fitting,” or using a model created from a small subset of experi- ences to maneuver according to a much broader set of experiences.


CONCLUSION At ARL, we are researching specific advances to address these areas of sens- ing, modeling self-motion and modeling robotic interaction with the world, with the understanding that doing so will enable great enhancements in the opera- tional speed of autonomous vehicles.


Specifically, we are working on knowing when and under what conditions different methods of sensing work well or may not work well. Given this knowledge, we can balance how these sensors are combined to aid the robot’s motion estimation.


A much faster estimate is available as well through development of techniques to automatically estimate accurate models of


the world and of robot


WIRED FOR DISCOVERY Earl Jared Shamwell, one of the authors, sets up a multisensor robotics test bed to collect images, light detection and ranging data and inertial measurements. Researchers aim to improve robotic performance by closing the gap between what a robot expects to happen and what actually happens. (Photo by Jhi Scott, ARL)


self-motion.


With the learned and applied models, the robot can act and plan on a much quicker timescale than what might be possible with only direct sensor measurements.


Finally, we know that these models of motion should change depending on which of the many diverse environmen- tal conditions the robot finds itself


in.


To further enhance robot reliability in a more general sense, we are working on how to best model the world such that a collection of knowledge can be leveraged to help select an appropriate model of robot motion for the current conditions.


If we can master these capabilities, then Rosie can be ready for operation, lacking only her signature attitude.


For more information about ARL col- laboration opportunities in the science for maneuver, go to http://www.arl.army. mil/opencampus/.


DR. JOSEPH CONROY is an electronics engineer in ARL’s Micro


and Nano


Materials and Devices Branch, Adelphi, Maryland. He holds a doctorate, an M.S. and a B.S., all in aerospace engineering and all from the University of Maryland, College Park.


MR. EARL JARED SHAMWELL is a systems engineer with General Technical Services LLC, providing contract support to ARL’s Micro and Nano Materials and Devices Branch. He is working on his doc- torate in neuroscience from the University of Maryland, College Park, and holds a B.A. in economics and philosophy from Colum- bia University.


ASC.ARMY.MIL 105


SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176