search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BEEN THERE, DONE THAT


FIGURE 3 Manufacturing Readiness Levels


(as listed in the MRL Deskbook v2.2.1, October 2012)


MRL 1: Basic manufacturing implications identified. MRL 2: Manufacturing concepts identified. MRL 3: Manufacturing proof of concept developed.


MRL 4: Capability to produce the technology in a laboratory environment.


MRL 5: Capability to produce prototype compo- nents in a production-relevant environment.


MRL 6: Capability to produce a prototype system or subsystem in a production-relevant environment.


MRL 7: Capability to produce systems, subsystems or components in a production-representative environment.


MRL 8: Pilot line capability demonstrated; ready to begin low-rate initial production.


MRL 9: Low-rate production demonstrated; capabil- ity in place to begin full-rate production.


MRL 10: Full-rate production demonstrated and lean production practices in place.


MANAGING MANUFACTURING RISK


As these manufacturing readiness levels show, moving from an idea to a product in a Soldier’s hand is a long and multifaceted process. Managers must steer the development of new technologies and navigate the risks associated with manufacturing those technologies, all while keeping tabs on the budget and schedule. (SOURCE: OSD Manufacturing Technology Program in collaboration with the Joint Service/Industry MRL Working Group)


THE HOPEFUL Acknowledging that many acquisition programs have struggled during their development, much progress has been made, par- ticularly over the past 20 years, to help PMs successfully man- age their programs. Certain established practices will help PMs and their teams understand programs more clearly and manage them more effectively. Here are four acquisition best practices and resources that are not new but can make a big difference for those who apply them conscientiously and with discipline. I offer no statistical data to support them, although some of these references contain supporting statistics.


Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Guidance, April 2011 (updated). Since 2001, DOD has used technology readi- ness levels (TRLs)—developed by NASA in the 1980s and then adapted by the Air Force Research Laboratory—in major pro- grams, as GAO had long encouraged. Currently, DOD Instruc- tion (DODI) 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, requires TRAs for major defense acquisition programs at the release of a developmental request for proposal (RFP), milestone B and milestone C.


DOD uses nine TRLs to describe the developmental prog- ress of emerging systems as they pass through their prescribed milestones and phases. (See Figure 2, Page 141.) Tis common framework for technology development and common language to describe the waypoints are enormously useful to acquisition managers. Before the introduction of standardized TRLs, our understanding of the progress of developmental programs was significantly less clear; to characterize our progress, we used ter- minology that meant different things to different people. Today, the use of TRLs reduces the likelihood of misunderstanding whether a developing system has progressed to a specific inter- mediate milestone.


about half of the software development cost expended before the program’s milestone B, as described in the 2007 research report “Software Architecture: Managing Design for Achieving Warfighting Capability,” by Brad Naegle of NPS. It also sug- gests that software may be the pacing activity within hardware and software program developments—a fact reflected in many of the developmental programs in GAO’s 2015 “Defense Acqui- sitions” annual report.


142


Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook, Version 2.4, August 2015. Te manufacturing readiness levels closely parallel the TRLs. Ten MRLs describe and guide progress in preparation for the manufacture of emerging warfighting sys- tems as programs pass through their prescribed milestones and phases. (See Figure 3.)


Tese manufacturing readiness metrics overlay the milestones and phases of the Defense Acquisition System, providing con- crete measures of preparation and activity that culminate in full-rate production. Besides the 10 levels, the MRL Deskbook identifies nine areas of manufacturing risk that call for tracking through each of the MRLs. Tese risk areas, or threads and sub-


Army AL&T Magazine


January-March 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176