your nomination, keep going back to the requirements to make sure that all aspects of the nomination are addressed succinctly but completely.
Use the judging criteria as an outline for organizing your nomination. Using the same criteria headings in your write-up enables judges, who have limited time to review each nomination, to quickly evaluate your nomi- nee and will reduce the chance that critical information will be overlooked.
Follow the guidelines. Three pages means three pages. One page means one page. Don’t use wider margins or smaller fonts to cram more onto a page. Instead, hone your narrative: Use concise language to meet the requirements. If you’ve tried all that and still exceed the page limit, consider modifying the format: bullets, acronyms and brief state- ments can effectively convey a lot of information in a small amount of space. Judges are selected because of their expertise in the award area, so they’re likely to understand terminology that would confuse a layperson.
Tell a story. Telling a story does not necessarily mean moving chron- ologically from beginning to end. It means giving each element of the nomination a logical flow so that judges get a clear picture of the accomplishment and can see clearly why the individual is deserving of recognition. Try this structure:
a. This is what the nominee achieved. b. This is why it’s important. c. This is the effect of that achievement.
The same schema can be used to express the value of the achievement and the example of the individual’s leadership. Eliminate phrases that are likely repetitive and just take up space, such as “in this position” and “in this capacity.”
Be specific. Substantiate all claims. If you say some program is “the best” or that a system is faster or stronger, make sure the
language in the nomination backs that with facts that can be documented. Use these points, for example:
•What measurable outcomes resulted from the nomi- nee’s achievement?
• Include specific achievements and tangible benefits. • Clearly articulate the challenges and scope of responsibilities.
• How did the accomplishments impact the unit or command?
Talk with your nominee and those who work with him or her to identify specifics about the nominee’s leadership. How have these accomplishments affected the team, the organization or individual team members?
DO NOT cut and paste from requirements documents or an organization’s marketing literature.
Be concise. Avoid overuse of superlatives and empty-sounding praise. A little puffed-up language is fine in award nomi- nations if it is used sparingly. But nomination forms are short, and most often the space can be better filled with information that supports your claim. Specifically:
• Avoid the use of too many pronouns and run-on sentences.
• Use simple tenses: “led” rather than “has led.” “Did” rather than “has done.”
• Choose active voice—“Gen. Smith decided to over- haul the program”—over passive voice: “A decision was made to overhaul the program.”
Proofread. Then proofread again. Make sure you and at least one other person proofread your statements. Grammatical errors and misspelled words detract from the quality of the nomination.
Information about upcoming acquisition awards and past winners can be found at
http://asc.army.mil/web/ acquisition-awards/. Good luck!
—Army AL&T Staff
ASC.ARMY.MIL
161
WORKFORCE
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176
