DREAMING OF A STRATEGY
STREAMLINING PROCESSES In addition to emphasizing outcome over simple compliance, the DOD acquisi- tion system must evolve to excise from the rule book burdensome activities with little value. One way to stream- line the process would be to consolidate acquisition dollar thresholds
incorpo-
rated in DOD regulatory guidance. Te procurement regulations have multiple thresholds, with various rules for appli- cation depending on the commodity or service, whether it is commercially avail- able or a noncommercial item; the delivery and performance
locations (within or
outside the continental United States); and whether it should be set aside for our congressionally mandated socioeconomic programs. It is possible to consolidate many of these thresholds to establish a set of rules that apply regardless of the requirement, place of performance or delivery location.
As a member of the 809 Panel and a career contract specialist, I, along with
my DOD compatriots on the panel, plan to explore ways to clarify existing policy on a number of topics, such as contract type, determination of commercial items and competition rules to ensure that they are necessary and,
and straightforward. Current guidance to contracting officers is well-intended but
can be
if so, are clear complicated and confus-
ing because of the evolutionary nature of the rulemaking process, which has a tendency to endlessly add, and rarely remove, statutory and policy guidance. Compounding this is agency-level guid- ance that supplements higher-level policy.
Te process could be significantly more effective if contracting officers and others involved had to follow a single regula- tion that was less prescriptive than the existing rule book and had limited supplementation. Clear, easy-to-follow regulations would reduce administrative burdens, improve compliance and make it easier for the various players to work toward a common goal.
In creating a vision for the future, it is likely that the government and industry must abandon our current approach, which lacks this kind of collaborative environment in contract management and oversight.
136 Army AL&T Magazine January-March 2017
It is important to note that, as a depart- ment, we focus a lot of our attention on policies related to weapon system devel- opment; however, in FY15 the Army spent nearly 62 percent of its contract obligations on services, and in FY16 over 61 percent. Given the preponderance of contracting for services, I expect the 809 Panel will focus some of its efforts on reviewing DOD acquisition regula- tions that apply to services. Although DOD’s Better Buying Power initiatives focus on strategic management of ser- vices acquisition, some Army reporting requirements related to contracting for services are extremely burdensome, such as the accounting of contractor ser- vices and requests for services contract approval. Automating these manual pro- cesses would benefit both government and industry.
WORKFORCE CHALLENGES Finally, should the 809 Panel introduce a significantly streamlined or entirely new acquisition process, commonly known as the “nuclear option,” it must ensure that DOD has a fully trained and empow- ered workforce to implement it properly. Tat is because, if codified as envisioned, streamlined processes would not require the same level of oversight as current processes. Our contracting workforce, in turn, would need to acquire a certain level of expertise sooner than required today to take advantage of the flexibility of simplification and justify the reduction in oversight. To be effective managers of a newly simplified process, acquisition professionals must be adequately trained, both formally and on the job, to think critically, and they must have the author- ity to make decisions at the lowest possible level.
In this vein, the panel has tremen- dous freedom to review and make recommendations on deleting or revis- ing department regulations. It likely will focus on revising regulations where nec- essary to make them less prescriptive and
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176