search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Unintended Benefits


USASAC’s FMS ef forts around the world benefit warfighters, industry and the defense acquisition community closer to home.


L


ike its embattled cousin acquisition reform, strategic acquisition faces


long-standing challenges, among


them navigating a complex, billion-dollar bureau- cracy. As experts debate ways to perfect the defense


acquisition process, one Alabama-based command is making an impact close to home with an international approach.


Te U.S. Army Security Assistance Command (USASAC) at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, manages security assistance pro- grams and $176 billion in foreign military sales (FMS) cases. With support from DOD agencies, American industry and its higher headquarters,


the U.S. Army Materiel Command,


USASAC provides materiel, training and other services to help 150 allied nations and organizations strengthen their defense capabilities. Tose efforts help achieve regional stability and international security—and also bolster the acquisition commu- nity through partner nation investments.


“Take, for example, a partner nation that is funding an FMS case. If they discover they need a technology augmented because they’re fighting in a certain terrain or under particular circum- stances, they may request we enhance a piece of equipment or technology,” said Sean Hicks, a USASAC country program manager who oversees cases for several Middle Eastern nations. At the country’s request, a portion of its FMS funds is diverted to help fund the research and development (R&D) of the desired enhancement, Hicks explained.


“Now we have this upgrade that, in some cases, the United States would have developed sooner or later, but it wasn’t a driving force at that moment,” he said. “Te partner nation is now a co-investor in the new technology, and we both win because we are fielding a technology much sooner than expected, at a much lower cost due to the shared investment, and it is a tech- nology that will improve the U.S. mission and the safety of our warfighters.” And, although the U.S. government and partner nation share the R&D costs, Hicks noted, both the original and


upgraded technology remain the intellectual property of the United States.


Partner nations can also benefit, said Hicks, in one of two ways: Te United States can reimburse them for their investment, or other nations may offer to pay for use of the new technology.


BOOSTING THE BASE Additionally, partner-invested enhancements can mitigate work- load shortages and sustain the expertise of industry workers during peacetime across the 23 depots, arsenals and ammuni- tion plants that make up the Army’s organic industrial base (OIB).


Te Army’s OIB is vital to Soldier readiness, said Maj. Gen. Ste- phen E. Farmen, the USASAC commander. “It is a national security readiness insurance policy and has to be there—up and running—the moment we need it.” Te OIB allows the United States to build and reset weapon systems quickly and decisively, not at the civilian sector’s pace, which is hindered by a sometimes sluggish contracting process. During Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom, the OIB reset nearly 4 million items, a workload three times that of the Vietnam War. Since 2003, the reset workload has constituted more than $29 billion in Army equipment and more than $5.7 billion in equip- ment for the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy.


FMS also benefits Army acquisition through economies of scale: Te United States is able to purchase equipment at lower per- unit cost as the order size increases. “It costs less and less to produce more and more,” said Hicks, adding, “At the end of the day, the positive impact of FMS has a wide reach—and not only from a national security and partner nation standpoint, but also from an OIB, industry, fiscal and acquisition standpoint.”


—MS. ADRIANE ELLIOT, USASAC PUBLIC AFFAIRS


ASC.ARMY.MIL 55


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176