search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Business Architecture: Te War Game. For how the game eventually came to work, see “About the Game” on Page 16.


A SURPRISE REVEAL Two teams of ARDEC employees played the game for three days. On the final day of the game, the Tiger Team was declared the winner over Skunk Works. We held an after-action review with all of the participants and made clear the real purpose of the game. Most of the participants knew little or nothing about business architecture, and that was the point. We used the war game to drive home the message that business architec- ture can help make decisions at all levels of the organization.


Dan Crowley, chief of the Process Improve- ment and Management Group at ARDEC and a war game participant, said that he supports the development and use of a business architecture because “by adopt- ing a business architecture, anyone in the organization is able to assess the capabil- ities and use this information to make quicker and better strategic decisions.”


War game participant Kevin Hayes, deputy director in the Enterprise and Systems Integration Center, observed that “busi- ness architecture can be used to support annual budget planning as it provides the ability to quickly see where weak areas of the organization are and make better investment trade-off decisions.”


Managers can act in the role of the market team, determining which capabilities are necessary for investment. Just as, in the game, the budget proposal will contain capability investments and justifications. Managers, or higher-level organizations, now have data helping to drive decisions and support an enlightened strategic discussion.


CONCLUSION We have entered an age of disruption, where agility trumps scale and strategy takes on a new role and a new meaning. ARDEC Military Deputy Col. Richard Hornstein considers business architecture


“a great leader and management capability for strategic leaders to decompose infor- mation and aid in the decision-making process.”


Te business architecture war game is a powerful tool that can be used for any significant strategic undertaking that is fraught with uncertainty. As a planning tool, it raises the visibility of the make- or-break uncertainties that are sure to be common in modernizing the Army. Te acquisition enterprise is so complex in its vast number of capabilities that it takes a tool like this to make it comprehensi- ble to those who know only their little corner of it.


With a task as monumental as moderniz- ing the Army—the largest service branch of the world’s largest bureaucracy—the ability to visualize organizations as a whole, and understand what they are capa- ble of, matters more than ever.


I’m determined to show that business architecture can enable ARDEC—or any organization—to do a better job of look- ing at our capacity to execute our mission as the external environment changes. Tese changes might include budget cuts, hiring freezes and new requirements.


ARDEC, through its use of business architecture, is ensuring adaptability and flexibility to meet the challenges required to develop the future force. Tis model can be used by any Army organi- zation—indeed, DOD itself—to think in a more holistic way and to promote organizational learning and continuous improvement.


As we continue to find new opportunities to apply business architecture concepts to improve our planning and execution of the armament research, development and engineering mission, ARDEC will remain relentlessly focused on developing the world’s best armament and munition systems for the warfighter.


For more information, contact the author at kathleen.r.walsh.civ@mail.mil.


MS. KATHLEEN R. WALSH is a busi- ness architect at ARDEC. She is a Certified Enterprise Architect from Carnegie Mellon University, and holds a Master of Engi- neering degree in systems engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology and a B.S. in computer science from Ramapo College of New Jersey. She holds a Certificate in Leadership Dynamics from the Univer- sity of Pennsylvania; earned certificates in game design, story and narrative develop- ment from California Institute of the Arts; received business architecture training from the Business Architecture Institute; and studied filmmaking at the Barrow Group in New York City. She holds professional memberships in the Association of Enterprise Architects, the Business Architecture Guild and the International Institute of Busi- ness Analysis (IIBA), and she has spoken at the Business Architecture Guild’s Innova- tion Summit, the IIBA Building Business Capability, the Twin Cities Business Archi- tecture Summit and the National Defense Industrial Association’s systems engineering conferences.


CONTRIBUTORS: Mr. Joseph A. Brescia, chief of the Stra- tegic Transformation Office, ARDEC; and Ms. Radhika Patel, systems engi- neer, ARDEC.


HTTPS: / /ASC.ARMY.MIL


15


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144