search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EXPERIMENTS IN HYPERSPEED


WHAT’S ON THAT WARHEAD? Blundering into a nuclear exchange is one such possible implication that concerns defense analysts, and it has occasionally concerned Congress since the advent of the Prompt Global Strike program in the early 2000s. Congress has generally supported the program, but it has with- held funds for some requests from DOD, citing concerns about the possibility of accidental nuclear war. “Radars would provide much less warning time of a boost-glide weapon attack than a ballis- tic missile attack,” Acton wrote in his 2013 study “Silver Bullet?” If a targeted country does not know whether the weapon due to arrive in minutes is carrying a conven- tional or a nuclear warhead, would it take the risk of leaving what could be a nuclear strike unchallenged?


FIRST TEST FAILS


NASA’s X-43A hypersonic research aircraft and its modified Pegasus booster rocket spiral into the Pacific Ocean off the California coast in June 2001. After being released from NASA’s NB-52B carrier aircraft, the X-43A and the Pegasus booster, which was supposed to acceler- ate the X-43A to Mach 7, lost control about eight seconds after ignition of the Pegasus rocket motor. Explosive charges were triggered to terminate the flight, which was part of NASA’s research into alternative uses for hypersonic flight. (Photo by Jim Ross/NASA via Getty Images)


Acton is not convinced that DOD has made a serious case “that the strategic benefits [of having hypersonic weapons] outweigh the strategic risks of escalation with Russia and China.” Others worry about the wider risk of arms-racing and missile proliferation. Air Force Lt. Col. Jeff Schreiner wrote in a 2014 Stars and Stripes op-ed calling for a hypersonic test ban: “Te tactical planner in me sees countless uses for hypersonic delivery plat- forms against a range of target sets. Te strategic planner sees the ability to help offset other nations’ strategic assets with a conventional versus nuclear strike. Te pessimist in me sees a technology that has the potential to spiral out of control in many nations into deadly new nuclear delivery platforms.”


for worse hypersonic weapons are likely to become a significant feature of the inter- national landscape and could have quite significant strategic implications. I think we’re kind of feeling our way through


60 Army AL&T Magazine


what those implications could be,” said James Acton, a nuclear physicist with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, in a September 2017 interview with Army AL&T.


October-December 2018


MACH 10 IS NOT ENOUGH One benefit that could counterbalance the risks of inadvertent escalation would be the ability to get around an adver- sary’s missile defense systems. Right now missile defenses are designed with a ballis- tic missile’s flight path, altitude and speed


+


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144