search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


Environmental Health Research that enables researchers to visualize the interconnectedness of tailored genome assays with pathological networks and phenotypes for cells or organisms in a data-agnostic manner. This tool allows researchers to easily explore genomic data sets, which tend to be large and difficult to manage, in order to iden- tify interactive networks.


• Functional Heatmap, made by the same group that developed Panora- miX. It is an automated and interactive tool enabling pattern recognition in time-series data, providing a means for researchers to identify trends driven by functional changes. This tool translates numerical data, generally from data sets that are very large and cumbersome to manually evaluate, into color-defined visualizations, allowing researchers to more easily identify patterns.


DISCUSSING THE WAY FORWARD Te workshop closed with a panel discus- sion driven by questions that arose during the two-day event. Te group discussed the greatest opportunities for integra- tive biomedical research as well as the potential to develop disruptive medical


capabilities that could change the land- scape of force readiness by improving warfighter lethality.


Participants also discussed the extensive bureaucratic inhibitors that delay the establishment of collaborations as well as barriers that prevent effective data sharing, such as concerns about intellec- tual property and data rights. Tere was unquestionable agreement that collabo- ration is essential to avoid duplication of efforts.


Leadership echoed the need for a team approach in support of the warfighter.


“We are all working on the same puzzle,” said Dr. Ben Petro, acting director of the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. “But you all are working on a puzzle that has millions of pieces. If we are working on the same puzzle, how should we organize ourselves strategically?”


Petro continued, “Reach out to others working on a puzzle and figure out how the piece I’m working on provides [clues] to the larger puzzle. As we find pieces that can help other people, we are sharing. Te puzzle is a holistic view of the warfighter


across all activities and all health states. Te opportunity I see here is convergence.”


Dr. William Mattes, director of the Divi- sion of Systems Biology at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s National Center


for Toxicological Research, discussed the topic of standardization.


“When I think of integrative biomedical research, one of the things that catapulted the genomic field was standardizing the data files,” he said. “We need to force some standardization, and there are so many opportunities there. It makes it more effi- cient. Ten you aren’t duplicating efforts, you are synergizing efforts.”


Efficiency is extremely important, said Maj. Jonathan Stallings, acting direc- tor of USAMRMC’s Office of Regulated Activities. “We should talk about standard- ization up front,” he said. “Collectively, we need to pull minds together and decide what standardization looks like. Tis would allow us to deliver efficiency in a time when money is precious.”


Working together will allow teams to bring ideas to fruition more quickly, according to Dr. George Ludwig, princi- pal assistant for research and technology


INNOVATIVE MILITARY RESEARCH


Dr. Robert Green, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and director of the Genomes2People Research Program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Broad Institute, presents “The MilSeq Project: Enabling Personalized Medicine through Exome Sequencing in the U.S. Air Force” at the workshop. This work is funded by the U.S. Air Force. (Photo by USAMRMC Public Affairs)


https://asc.ar my.mil


31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128