search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ARMY AL&T


owner. Te authorization generally spec- ifies what can be looked for, as a warrant for a physical search does: It’s usually not blanket permission to rifle through a house (or read all the texts on an iPhone) at random, but permission to look for things that might be relevant to a case.


IT’S META, MAN Detectives in the non-digital realm look for strands of hair, tire tracks or weap- ons. Digital forensics investigators look for digital data—files, images, video— and metadata. Metadata is information about data, such as when it was created, if it was modified and by whom. Te length of a phone call, for instance, is metadata that can be useful even if investigators can’t get or can’t use the contents of the conversation.


Finding links among the many pieces of data is a key contribution of digital foren- sics tools. Analyzing those connections can open up new leads to investigate. If an investigator notices that each of the


three phones sent to a lab connected to the wireless network at McDonald’s on Main Street, that’s a new lead: It could place the suspects together in one location, and the agents working the case could try to inter- view the McDonald’s employees working on that day.


IN THE LAB Army CID now uses upward of 20 forensic tools, each fairly specialized, to investigate and analyze digital devices, according to Eller. Twenty years ago, a case might involve a few hard drives from the suspect’s laptop, and one kind of soft- ware could do all the necessary analysis. Nowadays investigators might need to search a smartphone, an Amazon Alexa, a tablet and the onboard computers from a suspect’s car. Te tools available to access and search computing devices for evidence have likewise grown in number and power.


Digital forensics tools on the market


include EnCase, the granddaddy of digi- tal forensics. It has been in use since 1998,


when it was used primarily to search and analyze hard drives seized during crimi- nal investigations. Now it’s a suite of tools that law enforcement can use to search digital devices linked to a possible crime, and that organizations can use to defend against cyberattacks or to collect informa- tion about the attacks.


Access Data’s Forensic Toolkit can scan a device for “text strings”—groupings of characters—and use those to build a dictionary to decrypt emails or other data that has been encrypted. It can also scan for malware and then analyze what the malicious code could be designed to do, where the infection could have come from, and if the malware is communicating with an outside server or website.


But before forensics examiners can analyze data, they need to be able to see it. Most devices now offer the option of encryption with a passcode, and so there’s another set of digital forensics tools that specialize in breaking that encryption.


TOOLS OF THE TRADE


Working in laboratories such as this one, digital forensics examiners have access to tools that help them investigate and analyze digital devices. With the proliferation of devices from which to extract valuable information, the software required to perform that analysis has become highly specialized, and the tools available to access and search computing devices for evidence have grown in number and power. (Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user Viktor DFC)


https://asc.ar my.mil


67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128