search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Chao: Te point was a little bit the reverse. As DOD or government


is trying to


encourage innovation, one of the things that in some ways make the government different than the commercial market is that, in the commercial market, you can create your own market. To the extent that you invent a product in the commer- cial world, it’s also possible to invent the market. Tere was no such thing as the iPad market until Apple invented it; we all discovered that we wanted or “needed” one, and voila,


the market category is


created. Te government market doesn’t work that way: Tere needs to be a budget to buy an innovation and often, if a new technology is created but doesn’t match a budget bucket, it takes time to create one. Te creation of that technology bucket is not purely market- or demand-driven: there’s politics, bureaucratic policies and other drivers.


And so there you need more of a demand signal from the customer in the defense world in order to stimulate innovation:


“Tis set of capabilities is important to me,” or, “Solving this problem is impor- tant to us.”


Te part that’s becoming very difficult for the industry is that, during the Cold War, you had a very large demand signal: “Beat the Soviet Union.” Tat allowed industry to self-organize around that grand stra- tegic goal. As long as you were working to solve those kinds of problems, you were pointing in the right direction. Tat became extremely muddied at the end of the Cold War, where we lost that demand signal, and that was about the last time we had, I would argue, an innovation challenge that was so clearly defined at a grand strategic level.


And then the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan came along, and that, at least, provided some guidance, or some demand signals,


INNOVATION SAVES LIVES Army Reserve SGT Santiago Zapata of the 323rd Engineering Clearance Company uses the Talon tracked military robot to clear a route of IEDs in June at the Combat Support Training Exercise at Fort McCoy, WI. War makes clear which problems need solving, spurring innovation—like the counter-IED capabilities industry and government developed during the Iraq and Afghanistan con- flicts. (U.S. Army photo by SFC Brian Hamilton, 108th Training Command – Initial Entry Training)


and you saw people step up to the plate with innovations to solve the war’s problems—everything from MRAPs [mine-resistant, ambush- protected vehicles] to different kinds of sensors or counter-IED [improvised explosive device] gear or UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles]. People knew where to innovate because they had a clear capability demand signal.


Now, we’re back in this mode where industry has lost the demand signal— which priorities


are important versus


which ones are not. Is it to solve the high- end threat? Is it to solve the issues related to regional threats? Or is it still the terror- ism challenge?


Army AL&T: You talked about mature technologies, and one of the things that comes to mind is enabling tech- nologies. Tim Berners-Lee developed HTML and had really no idea where it would go, but knew that it could go somewhere. How important is that sort


of thing—having those enabling tech- nologies—to innovation?


Chao: Oh, it’s critical. Tat’s why throughout history innovation has not occurred in a linear fashion. Tere are bursts of activity. Tere’s a fundamen- tal, underlying, enabling technology that gets discovered—electricity, the internal combustion engine or the microproces- sor—that drives follow-on innovation. Te modern world is still experiencing the aftereffects of the invention of the microprocessor and integrated circuit. We’ve been living in an era that’s been generally tied to Moore’s Law: process- ing power doubling every two years. And now it’s combined with the revolution in telecommunications, enabling the sets of technologies that wire the world together, providing the infrastructure for the Internet revolution—which then permits collaboration at a scale and level that’s never existed before, triggering social and business model revolutions.


ASC.ARMY.MIL 113


CRITICAL THINKING


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208