search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE ‘ART’ OF THE RED TEAM


techniques used by adversaries. Vulner- abilities are further identified using a warfighter technology trade-space meth- odology, which is an assessment tool that probes technical, usability, user interface and logistic factors. Te assessment team collects data, conducts analysis and pro- vides feedback to developers for system improvement.


LIVE-EXPERIMENTATION LANDSCAPE This site at Stennis, MS, where TSOA live experiments took place in February 2014, and other TSOA venues represent a variety of challenging opera tional environments. (Photo by Jeff Swensen, Human Habits Inc.)


taking the system to a TSOA to look at interoperability and integration with other systems as well as concepts of oper- ation in increasing complex scenarios. It could also involve injecting a component into VDE. Tere could also be individu- ally designed experiments and exercises that are not TSOA- or VDE-specific, as well as a host of other investigations and assessments.


LIVE, EXPERIMENTAL, COLLABORATIVE Live experiment venues balance assessment with development, are extraor- dinarily collaborative based on feedback the team has received from participants, and are designed to push systems to the next level of interoperability and integra- tion. As a result, developers from both industry and government can make fixes


“in the dirt,” working with the TSOA red team on the ground. During the in-brief on day one, personnel are encouraged to integrate systems into the common operational picture and to interoperate with other systems through scenarios. Tere are dedicated team members on the ground who support developers in integra- tion and interoperability. Tese venues are conducted at military ranges across the country and have included Camp Roberts, CA; Stennis, MS; and Marine Corps Base


82


Quantico, VA. Tey are not formal test and evaluation events, or developmental or operational tests. Tey provide develop- ers the means to experiment and red-team without having to create the infrastructure, establish an actual red team, requisi tion warfighters or develop scenarios.


Tis atmosphere of openness and coop- eration has become the hallmark of live engagements with the Systems ART team. In this field environment, when the barriers to collaboration are decreased, organizations can work together to solve a common problem. Tis collaboration has led to the two developer groups work- ing together to increase the effectiveness of an unmanned aerial system by incor- porating algorithms to improve video quality. Pursuing integration encourages developers to maximize the use of data standards such as the Integrated Sensor Architecture and to reduce the need for operators to look at multiple displays.


Te Systems ART initiative combines technical experts in engineering, radio frequency communication, computer network security and other areas with systems engineers and operators, and uses robust, structured assessments. Tese experts identify vulnerabilities from jam- ming, network attack, spoofing and other


Te Systems ART initiative has assessed more than 200 technologies, including unmanned systems, sensors, radars, blast protec tion and power generation systems, among others. For more than 40 percent of these assessments, the team returned to demonstrate mitigated vulnerabilities or other improvements based on feed- back, or to continually learn how the system performs


against adaptive threat emulation.


‘ART’ APPRECIATION Te operational community, for one, has noted the value of the Systems ART initiative. For example, a theater special operations command has deployed three different ART-vetted systems for use in operations.


One such system is the Virtual Accom- pany (VA) kit, which allows the small unit


to accompany teams through a


virtual presence, provide guidance and receive timely information. Te VA kit consists of several ART-vetted technolo- gies that were improved, selected and integrated into operationally relevant kits.


Te operational command funded the integration and fielding of these kits, which are credited with enabling pin- point accuracy and destroying hundreds of targets with no friendly fire casualties.


LESSONS LEARNED In reflecting on the System ART initia- tive’s progress, we offer the following


realistic and


Army AL&T Magazine


October-December 2015


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208