search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
reducing resource requirements to only the test assets, with the organization’s maneuver funds supporting personnel and equipment not provided by the pro- gram manager.


An additional benefit of using home sta- tion training for data collection is the increased opportunity


for Soldiers become familiar with the test asset. REALISM RULES


The integrity of a tent could be a matter of life or death for Soldiers operating in areas contaminat- ed by biological or chemical weapons. The Joint Expeditionary Collective Protection tent was put to rigorous testing this spring at the Yuma (AZ) Test Center and Tropic Regions Test Center, elements of ATEC. To adapt to numerous fiscal constraints, the T&E community is exploring more effective ways to test, collect meaningful data and evaluate systems with less money and fewer personnel. (U.S. Army photo by Carlos Mora, U.S. Army Tropic Regions Test Center)


operationally realistic DT environment can also reduce the scope of a subsequent OT event because there is no need to gather specific operational data again.


One example of leveraging DT to sup- port the OT evaluation is in the Joint Assault Bridge T&E master plan. ATEC will be


able to create an operation-


ally realistic environment during the production- qualification test by adding Soldiers and realistic scenarios


to the


last portions of the launch-and-retrieve cycles and the reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) miles of the operational-mode summary and mission profile testing.


In the past, civilians would conduct the total RAM event without adding Sol- diers and realistic scenarios to the event. Tus the event was missing Soldier-con- ducted RAM mileage, and RAM miles could not be reduced in the actual OT event, which ultimately meant higher cost. Te environment will be further improved by having the Soldiers perform their duties as vehicle crew members and execute their primary mission using


the Joint Assault Bridge. Avoiding the use of an opposing force saves valuable resources without affecting the reli- ability assessment. We expect that this combined DT-OT strategy will reduce the duration of the initial OT, from six to five weeks.


HOME STATION TRAINING With fewer deployments, priority for use of installation training areas is going to mission-essential task list (METL) validation and preparation for capstone events at CTCs, which are expecting organizational units to arrive prepared to execute their METL without requiring training. By identifying platoon- through battalion-level units that are preparing, ATEC can integrate system evaluations with scheduled maneuver home station training exercises to capitalize on oppor- tunities for Soldier feedback.


Historically, an OT is a stand-alone event, forcing the program manager to provide funding for test assets, blue force, oppos- ing force, support and sustainment costs. Using home station training for data col- lection benefits the program manager by


CTC ROTATIONS AND OPERATIONAL IMPACT Like NTC rotations at Fort Irwin, CA, Army CTCs are DA-resourced, large- scale, realistic operational events that offer a rich environment for conduct- ing program T&E. CTC formations are normally at the battalion or brigade level, which provide a better sample size for evaluation without additional cost to the program manager. School-trained and


-certified observer controllers are present to provide feedback on mission success and data collection, reducing the custom- ary number of data collectors.


By using the unit that participated in the home station training exercise, ATEC can eliminate the need to repeat new equipment training. In addition, the unit transports test assets to a CTC with its organic


equipment, providing critical


transportability data that can be used to support the system evaluation.


Evaluating operational effectiveness


and mission performance is the primary objective during a CTC event. ATEC uses the data collected to complement data from the DT and the home station events, resulting in a comprehensive evaluation report to inform Army decision-makers.


Successful T&E requires senior leader buy-in and early cross-organizational planning. ATEC prepares a memorandum


ASC.ARMY.MIL 21 to


ACQUISITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208