search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE METHODS BEHIND THE MYSTIQUE


check how we’re doing, and we’ve stayed pretty close to those [one-third] targets for the last seven years. Q. Google again topped Fortune’s list of the 100 best places to work in 2012 and has been in the top five since 2007. Why does Google go to such great


lengths


when you’re such a prestigious place to work anyway?


A. Te number one reason is, it’s just the right thing to do. You treat people the way you want to be treated, create a great environment that they want to be part of. What’s interesting is that most of the things we do don’t cost any money, or they cost very little. It’s hard to keep coming up with new stuff, but it doesn’t actually take that many resources. So every Tursday we have a company-wide meeting called TGIF, where the found- ers will stand up and say, “Tis is what happened this week,” and then there’s a no-holds-barred Q&A where you can ask any question you want, any question. And that costs nothing. It gives people in the company such a tremendous oppor- tunity to hear the founders speak, to see that they’re human, to see that that they’re brilliant and to see that employees have a voice in how the company works.


Tere’s a pragmatic reason, too, which is, if you think about it, talent movement


is becoming much more global, and it’s starting with the global elite—the people who have access to the best schools, the best companies, the people who are the most intellectually accomplished and have enough resources to be able to break out of wherever they are.


We have hundreds of people at Google who grew up in India and will tell you stories about how when they went to high school and college, there was one textbook that 20 of them shared, living in communal housing, and it was held together by twine, and they would pass it around at exam period, because that was the one textbook; nobody could afford to buy their own. And the people who did the best then found their way to the United States and then found their way to places like Google. Our head of sales, the chief business officer for the entire com- pany [Nikesh Arora], was one of these people. So what’s happening is, the best people on the planet are increasingly hav- ing more opportunity, and if you want to attract the best people on the planet and keep them, you do have to keep making your work environment better.


Q. How do you keep people growing intellectually and growing in the culture of the company, as opposed to “coasting,” for instance?


STARTING FROM A PLACE WHERE IT’S VERY STRUCTURED AND VERY REGULATED, YOU ONLY NEED TO DO VERY SMALL THINGS FOR PEOPLE TO EXPERIENCE IT AS TREMENDOUS FREEDOM.


A. Part of it is, we do look very closely at performance. We don’t force-rank or stack-rank, but we do periodically iden- tify people who are lower performers, which includes people who are


coast-


ing. We have an internal designation for people that we call “consistently low- meets.” So they’re consistently on the low end of meeting expectations. Whenever we see that, we reach out to them and say,


“What’s going on?” In most companies, the presumption is,


70 Army AL&T Magazine July–September 2013


Q. How do you define a person’s suc- cess,


in contrast with somebody who’s coasting?


A. It depends on what the job is. Tere are obvious, measurable aspects and less obvious, harder-to-measure aspects. If you’re a salesperson, we know how much


you fire these people. But from our per- spective, if we’ve done our job right in recruiting them and investing in them, they’re pretty good people. So you don’t want to fire them; what you want to do is understand what has happened that’s caused this great person to flatten out in their trajectory. And we help them get better at their job, or we move them into a new job. And if that doesn’t work, then we help them find something outside the company. But what we find is, 80 percent of the time, when you have one of these folks in one of these cases and they switch into a new job, performance gets much better; it reverts to the mean.


More broadly for the company, though, we just try to create an incredibly stim- ulating environment. So, for example, we have these things called Tech Talks (online at http://www.youtube.com/ talksatgoogle). In any given week, we’ve got 50-plus talks happening all around Google. It’s people who’ve writ- ten books coming in to talk about their books; it’s political people coming in to talk about what they believe; it’s art- ists; it’s actors. And, as often as not, it’s Googlers standing up and presenting to other Googlers about what they’re doing and what they’re working on. Te idea is, it’s an hour of a week for somebody to do this, but it creates an environment where you’re constantly being stimulated with new ideas, challenged to learn and think in new ways. Tat, by the way, is another program that costs nothing. It just costs a little bit of time.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196